Jump to Navigation

Miami-Dade's Pit Bull Blood Money | Susan Clary

Our Columnists
Informed Personalities from Across the State, Across the Spectrum
 

Miami-Dade's Pit Bull Blood Money | Susan Clary

Susan Clary's picture
Miami-Dade's Pit Bull Blood Money
Thursday, February 16, 2012 — Susan Clary

After a young girl was mauled by a pit bull terrier in 1989, Miami-Dade banned the breed. And before long, the county shelter was destroying thousands of dogs, stray and owner-loved, that bore a resemblance to the pit bull.  

Miami-Dade is not alone. A wave of breed-specific legislation swept the nation, targeting beloved dogs with a broad brush that public-health experts now agree doesn’t work and isn’t appropriate.

In fact, a year after Miami-Dade passed the pit-bull ban, the state of Florida made it illegal to discriminate against dogs because of their breed, but gave Miami-Dade an exemption. Now, for the first time in 23 years, two bills are moving through the Legislature to remove this exemption.

Yet for reasons that appear to include money, Miami-Dade Commissioners are fighting hard to keep the ban.

They met Tuesday night, determined to stall a Tallahassee vote that could lead to the ban’s demise. Instead, they suggested the question be put to voters in August, when few voters turn out.

Better these commissioners allow the repeal to go forward, given all that we know about the failure of these bans. 

In the interests of full disclosure, I run a small-breed dog rescue in Orlando and serve on the board of the Miami Coalition Against Breed Specific Legislation. In other words, I know something about this issue.

What you should know is that these bans are ineffective and fraught with unfair consequences. Research by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals shows breed-specific bans do not improve public safety. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control discourages such bans because of the inaccuracy in dog-bite data, the difficulty in identify dog breeds and the endless, needless slaughter.

Besides, other laws exist to deal with dangerous dogs.

So why do Miami-Dade commissioners so badly want to preserve the ban? Why, in the middle of their meeting, were two commissioners text-messaging the bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Carlos Trujillo, asking him to withdraw the legislation?

It’s about money, pure and simple. 

Miami-Dade stands to lose millions of dollars in fines and penalties if the ban is lifted. Call it: pit bull blood money.

Here’s how it works: If you’re caught with a pit bull in Miami-Dade, you’re fined $500. If you don’t quickly appeal or surrender the animal, that fine increases to $10,500 after 51 days. If you fail to pay, a lien can be placed on your home, even if you’re just renting.  To sell the house, the owner must pay the lien.

Between 2009-2011, records show this scheme added more than $1.7 million to Miami-Dade’s bottom line.

During that same time, the county killed more than 1,000 dogs judged to be pit bulls, many taken from their families.

People don’t want to see innocent dogs killed. And experience shows sweeping breed-specific laws don’t work. 

The Florida Legislature should do the right thing for good dogs and good owners. Lift the ban.

And rather than focusing on fines and liens, Miami-Dade should establish a strong spay-neuter policy, strengthen its anti-tethering ordinance and crack down on owners who keep dogs, not as pets, but for fighting, guarding and image enhancement.

It’s time to end the shameful slaughter of innocent dogs.

Lift the ban.

Formerly a reporter for the Tampa Bay Times and Orlando Sentinel, Susan Clary is a freelance writer in Orlando. She can be reached at sclary@floridavoices.com

© Florida Voices

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments

Comments

These polls are FAR from biased-pit bull zealot internet groups are LINKING all of these pit bull petitions and asking their readers to sign them, millions of users collectively NOT EVEN LIVING IN FLORIDA, and even in foreign countries including to our FL law makers. The DRUG CARTEL approves of the pit bull ban lift because these dogs are used by thugs and gangs as weapons against law enforcement. The Drug Cartel also does animal fighting ventures to distribute their illegal drugs and weapons. I have a suspicion that the pit bull ban lift has wealthy lobbiests - and you wait and see - it WILL pass because whatever the Drug Cartel wants, they get, paying our law makers called lobbyists.

So because the cartels may use these dogs, all the innocent dogs should die? Is that really what you are saying? Get real, there are plenty of breeds the cartels can use for criminal purposes. Do you want to ban all dogs? All over the world countries are removing bans because they realize it doesn't work. All over the United States, cities are repealing bans because they don't work. They are expensive to enforce. They cause undue hardship to families that are responsible and have great dogs that are not dangerous. It's discriminatory and just loathsome. And with the money-link explained in the article, what makes the commisioners any less corrupt than the cartels? Nothing beats a firm dangerous dog law that is enforced. Even more important is an enforced leash/control law. I hope Miami-Dade can move out of the 'dark ages' soon and repeal their ban. As for people from different parts of the country being involved, so what? I might want to retire in Florida in a couple years. At that point it becomes MY issue if my dog can't come with me. The far majority of these dogs are not dangerous at all. There are a huge number of 'pit bull-like' dogs that are miscategorized as 'pit bulls', and these types of dogs are the most popular in the U.S. these days.
The continuous portrayal by some that these are 'killer' dogs perpetuates a stupid myth. If they were portrayed as the loving family dogs they really are, perhaps the criminals would be less interested in owning them. It's the very hype supported by such bans that makes those who should have NO dogs want these dogs even more.

Talk about a stereotype. I guess you think every black or Hispanic will rob you too? I am a homeowner and business owner in South Florida. Our dogs do not guard drugs, they do tricks for treats. Get a grip and do some research.
http://www.aspca.org/fight-animal-cruelty/advocacy-center/animal-laws-ab...

The suggestion that "drug cartels" are driving the lift on the ban because they favor the use of pit bulls is ridiculous. A fine is not going to stop the "drug cartels" from using pit bulls any more than laws banning the sale of illegal drugs stops them selling illegal drugs. Criminals have no compunction against breaking laws.

Yes I might be from another state, however I live in the United States where everyone is innocent until proven guilty. I am not a drug cartel member, just a neighbor who loves all animals. I am fighting another silly law in my hometown that says I must have my windows and doors closed at all times because I own a certain breed of dog. I find it ridiculous that I am jailed in my own house and so are my pets. My dogs are not vicious, and I think it's ridiculous that someone thinks they are just because they look like a certain breed of dog. They need to repeal the archaic breed-discriminatory ordinances that target pit bulls. Dogs should be judged by their behavior, not their appearance.
These ordinances are costly and ineffective. They are inhumane and ineffective ordinances. Studies have shown that breed discrimination does not enhance public safety. There is a high cost and problems inherent in determining the heritage of mixed-breed dogs. We should hold reckless owners accountable for the behavior and care of their dogs. Rather than impose breed-discriminatory restrictions,laws that target dangerous dogs and reckless owners. These laws should include regulations that:
• Encourage residents to spay/neuter their pets
• Effectively manage dangerous dogs based on their behavior
• Restrict tethering
• Prevent reckless owners from having dogs
In a neighboring town, a DOBERMAN was running loose and attacked two dogs, mauling one to death. The owner is paying the price, via court fines and the euthanization of his dog. This is a perfect example that a BREED is not the problem.

Do not waste my time,am not a rocket-scientist with a computer which appears to be a problem with this site. Now go away FUCK OFF



Main menu 2

by Dr. Radut.